Quote:
Originally Posted by RunKC
At what point are we going to actually fix LT?
|
Who's to say we hadn't already? There's a lot to like about Jaylon Moore.
Or, from a different angle, who's to say we have NOW?
I mean if you think either guy is a 50/50 proposition at the LT spot, you've still only put together a 75% chance that you've finally found a starter there. Better, but by no means ironclad. And if you were starting with 50/50 on Moore, the odds that you've locked it down didn't go from zero to 75% with the Simmons get -- they went from 50 to 75%. Moreover, 50/50 is what you'd have with a Simmons who DIDN'T get injured. But we've done this math already. Ultimately, adding Simmons to Moore might move that needle from 50% likely to have a solution to 60% likely to have a solution.
That's...not a lot of marginal return.
Which is why at some point your STAFF needs to perhaps consider something that ISN'T a dogmatic refusal to change up your offense to help your LT.
{shrug}
It's done. And the 'why' of it isn't even in argument. Everyone has acknowledged why (many of whom would've even supported the why for someone like Conerly).
We'll see. Guy might be a genetic marvel. Might be the 1 of 1 that comes out of this as good as ever. Or maybe he's not and it's just another 1st round pick that didn't work out very well no differently than MEH or FAU.
What else is there but to wait and see?
But if y'all wanna come out here and 'call out' folks that don't like the pick, don't get all pissy when they....still don't like the pick.