Quote:
Originally Posted by TwistedChief
So your opinion is the odds don’t change after Burkholder examines him? Really?
And it needs to work out “with absolution”?
All higher upside players drafted at premium positions later in the first round are typically larger risks. FAU has contributed effectively 0. Kingsley one round later was a huge net negative.
There were dozens of people on this forum who probably would’ve been okay trading 2 1’s and 2 2’s to get into the top 10 to take a tackle like Campbell or Membou.
Would that have been much less risky for the future of this team?
|
How does Burkholder examining him change the odds? As if he can somehow dictate that the kid's tendon will beat those odds just because it looks good?
I never said it needs to work out with absolution.
I have no issue with calculated risk. This exceeds normality on that front.
Thanks for pointing out Veach's misses when there aren't medical odds involved.