Quote:
Originally Posted by Shields68
Basically where I am at, if your confident in Moore and he was not a hasty desperation signing it really is not a position we need, the pick absent injury is not seeing the field. Now next year and year after yes. But can say the same if Kelce retires, Hollywood is hurt... while any wr will see some snaps.
Any DL pick will earn a ton of snaps.
|
Right.
The only way an OL sees the field a great deal this year for KC is injury. They could play next year by design.
Well Egbuka or Burden are going to contribute MORE to the healthy version of this team than an OL would this year. And would very likely ALSO be needed to contribute in a big way next year by design.
There's just not a viable 'need' distinction to be made here, IMO.
Yet many people are and it's talking them into taking a guy who's doing one-legged squats on draft day who's also touting the hyper-aggressive nature of the ligament replacement surgery he had to have as though it's a GOOD thing.
I really don't get it.