Quote:
Originally Posted by duncan_idaho
I was saying there's no way I see Taylor lasting to 63. Not when they're talking about Warren and Loveland both going top 15.
I wouldn't hate taking Winston at 66, depending on they did with the first two picks. But if the first two picks are an OG and a TE, I would not like it. At that point, you're completely missing on the DL talent in this class.
|
Greatly depends for me. I do not want them giving up a draft pick to move up. I’d hate it if they traded 95 to go up to 24. I’ve been pretty consistent that the pick swap strategy would be fine with me.
If they want a tackle or weapon in rd 1, the DT’s in rd 2 are still damn good. Farmer, Sanders, Turner, etc. and I’d argue there isn’t a huge disparity between them and someone like Kenneth Grant.
There are so many Spags DE’s in this draft that the depth allows us to take one in rd 3 IMO. Jared Ivey, Sai’Vion Jones, Elijah Roberts, Ashton Gilotte, Barryn Sorrell, Jack Sawyer. I would imagine Spags and Cullen walked into the DL draft meeting with Spags with the biggest shit eating grins on their faces
I almost think taking a DE in rd 1 is counterproductive to value due to the depth there. But man if we could keep 63 AND 66 we could do some real ****ing damage on the DL with the opportunity to address something else in rd 1.
Let’s be honest. Veach is not conservative. He’s always gonna go full OCD tunnel vision for his guy. We’re going to trade up unless nobody wants to, and in this draft I can’t see that happening.