Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut
Man do I ever love the guys who's first line on their scouting report is "Versatile..."
If that's your first line, it means you're not great at anything. It means you're just passable at a lot of things. If you were great at anything, THAT would be why we should take you in the first round.
It's like nobody ever learned a thing from Cam Erving.
As for Taylor -- I have a buddy who's convinced himself that we should take him in the 1st. Chiefs fans and their OL and TEs, man... I don't see it. If you're saying the Chiefs wouldn't take him at the back of 2 - I don't think I agree with you. If you're saying he just flat won't last to the back of 2, that I kinda understand (though I still think he's a late riser and that's usually bullshit).
Honestly, if the Chiefs took Winston at 66, I wouldn't be floored. There's some Reid to his game. Physical, more athletic than his style of play (Reid was just never the ball-hawk that his athleticism and intelligence said he should be) and seems to be pretty smart.
This is a team that took Bryan Cook for....reasons. I could absolutely see them saying that they're worried Winston wouldn't get to the back of 3 so they need to take him at the top of 3. I'd hate it, but it's not THAT far out there.
|
I was saying there's no way I see Taylor lasting to 63. Not when they're talking about Warren and Loveland both going top 15.
I wouldn't hate taking Winston at 66, depending on they did with the first two picks. But if the first two picks are an OG and a TE, I would not like it. At that point, you're completely missing on the DL talent in this class.