Quote:
Originally Posted by kccrow
They like Harmon from everything I've seen. They need an upgrade over Loudermilk in the worst way, and Heyward is 35 years old. I can't see them passing on an upgrade at DE.
I think I had them taking Shemar Stewart and having him bulk back up to 290 in my mock.
|
Yeah, I typically have Harmon going to Pitt as well. Seems like a perfect fit.
But I was trying to force a landing spot for Simmons and got to around pick 18 and started looking for teams that could be interested in a LT that they absolutely do not want to play this year (so no pressing need at LT) but might be willing to gamble on. For the Steelers, who don't have much to play for and who could end up with Broderick as a viable long-term starter anyway (so a miss wouldn't be catastrophic if Simmons knee is never right), that was the first spot I found where it checked off enough boxes that it made sense to me.
Then I started looking to land Harmon somewhere. The Vikings weren't even a perfect fit, but if he's there when they're up, they'd take him or someone would trade up and do it (could even be us).
I pushed Burden up a bit because I'd absolutely be content with him at 31. I do think the Packers need a WR though; Watson just has too many question marks at this point. Wicks isn't terribly versatile, IMO and Doubs is pretty much a JAG. Reed's really good but I think Burden would make sense there.
Might be a little bit of a strange fit, but that's what happens when I'm trying to park guys I want the Chiefs to get a shot at and looking for reasonable landing spots for them.