Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut
I don't think I'd go this route, but if Starks is there, it's an interesting philosophical conversation.
Long-term, are we interested in building our defense through the back instead of the line? Because in Starks you have a guy who you take because you're projecting him to by Kyle Hamilton someday.
If you can have a secondary built around Trent McDuffie and a Kyle Hamilton sort of safety over the next 6 years or so...well its an interesting thought.
Not sure I'd do it. But I'd consider it.
|
I think the pivot to the run game, and the depth and quality of DL options makes it hard to not go that route. But like you I wouldn't mind.
This really feels like an excellent draft to go BPA and work back from there. If that's Starks, so be it.