Quote:
Originally Posted by Bearcat
Yeah, that's the point... no reason to brag about overall SEC numbers when they let in fourteen ****ing teams.  |
No bragging. But there's no need to gloat when a bunch of lower seeded teams lose, like they would from any conference.
What's the alternative? Put in those teams with almost or sub .500 records? Do we just not give them 14 because 14 is too many, even though no one else could produce the resume to get in?
I'm just chirping against the silly "oHhhH, sEc iZ thE BesT hUHHuuHH??" sarcasm.