Quote:
Originally Posted by kccrow
Much like DJ with Norman-Lott, who I really like as a situational pass-rush guy, my guy at DT has really become T.J. Sanders. If you can allow him the same freedom he had at SC to just create havoc, he's going to be special. He needs some coaching up on pad level and needs to add more mass to become a better bull rusher, but man can he add some juice to a lineup. He's also pretty damned stout against the run.
He kind of fits in that no-man's land for us though. He may or may not be a top 32 guy but he's a top 48 guy. So, do you take him in 1 because he's not likely there at 63.
|
That's why I keep circling around ONL
I just think it's damn likely he's there at the back of 2 and we just don't have the picks (with plenty of need) to be moving up.
I could see us moving the Thuney 4th to get into 5 this year and go after a RB, but I don't really see a good justification for moving up. And with the depth of the DL class, I don't love the idea of reaching a bit either.
I mean if you came out of that draft with Harmon, Ersery and ONL with those first 3 picks, I don't think that's necessary demanding miracles and it's a KILLER haul. If not Harmon, Scourton.
I agree with you that Sanders is caught in between but more than anything I feel like there are closer analogues to him that WILL be there at the back of 2 than there are at DE.