View Single Post
Old 03-16-2025, 03:50 PM   #7809
rfaulk34 rfaulk34 is offline
Veteran
 
rfaulk34's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2022
Location: Cincinnati
Casino cash: $-2120000
Quote:
Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 View Post
Exactly.

We could sit here all day and have a real, legitimate discussion about if it’s better to pay Jamarr Chase after his best year $41M AAV or if they should be trying to get a Tyreek-plus level trade haul.

But if you are gonna pay Chase that $41m, which is a totally fine decision, you CANNOT give the other WR $25m AAV in the same offseason, no less a guy who has struggled to stay healthy the past two years.
Yes you can. People that know how to structure cap numbers and use all available options can certainly can do it.

They just did a new TV contract in '21. The cap is going to continue to rise. It's already higher this year than expected and will continue to go up. In 2 years, the contracts this year will seem like bargains for the future market.

And like i just said, when they decide to do a Burrow restructure, the total cap hits will remain relatively the same year to year.
__________________
"Joey Brrrrrrridesmaid will never win a SB. Mother Faulker, your team will NEVER WIN A SUPER BOWL!!"

"History won't remember Joe Burrow. At all. Less than it will Matthew Stafford; similar to how it remembers Carson Palmer. Maybe he stays healthy and has a Matt Ryan career."--DJ'sLeftNut
Posts: 3,740
rfaulk34 would the whole thing.rfaulk34 would the whole thing.rfaulk34 would the whole thing.rfaulk34 would the whole thing.rfaulk34 would the whole thing.rfaulk34 would the whole thing.rfaulk34 would the whole thing.rfaulk34 would the whole thing.rfaulk34 would the whole thing.rfaulk34 would the whole thing.rfaulk34 would the whole thing.
    Reply With Quote