Quote:
Originally Posted by TRR
Yes and no. It just depends on how the deal is structured.
|
Not really.
Push money down the road if you want and there's still enormous opportunity cost there.
I'd rather have that money freed up for extensions for McDuffie and Karlaftis. Or Watson. Or Bolton. An upgrade on Danna long-term. A ball-hawking FS should a guy like Bates become available.
Or pretty much ANY other position on the football field other than the RG who is just an above average pass protector. Evidently the RB was the reason we couldn't run the ball -- give his money to a damn RB for all I care.
There's really no position apart from special teams that I'm LESS interested in spending at the top of the market on than a run-first RG.
There really isn't a single argument I can find that gets me anywhere close to on board with this.