Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut
Yeah -- heavy feet and iffy technique doesn't scream "run up there to turn in the draft card at 31" to me...
That's a need pick and little else, IMO. I really can't see a scenario where I'm taking him in the 1st.
Talk to me at the back of the 2nd. Maybe.
But no, I don't see any sort of surefire 1st round pick there at all.
|
Calm down Francis, my words are probably over hyped.
Yes, it is draft season, and there are plenty of people around here that believe 10 running backs are going to be selected before the Chiefs pick in the 2nd round....
My point on Ersery is that I can see Andy really liking him as a prospect and thus pulling the trigger if he's there. Thats all. And if they did it, I'd accept it.
As far as OT in this draft goes here is my position.
1. FA has to play out first. If they bring in a guy to play LT, it obviously impacts the draft, however they probably still need to be looking at both tackle spots.
2. The last thing I want the Chiefs to do is trade up for a tackle. We simply can't afford to spend the draft capital to take one the tackles that would be in our rage to acquire. They can take one at 31, or lower and I would understand it, but I wouldn't move up.
3. I'm firmly in the DT camp in round one, but when you are drafting at the 31st sport it all depends on how it falls. The right one needs to be there. With or first 4 picks I think the team needs to come out with a DT, OT, CB, and RB.
4. I know many are down on the talent in this draft, but besides LT, I think its got plenty for the Chiefs. I'd love to acquire another top 100 pick, but I don't think tagging and trading Smith is a possibility. But Chicago has two picks in the 2nd and I'd love to snag one because it would solve a lot of issues IMO.