Quote:
Originally Posted by RedinTexas
You're full of shit Mensa boy and you're too much of a ****ing coward to just admit you were wrong.
(A)nyone that says those 3 NFL championships in a row are comparable to the 3 Super Bowl championships in a row today is clearly making a specious argument. That is a specious argument just like you have admitted to making, so there is no surprise there.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedinTexas
BTW, in case you missed it, I called you a ****ing coward. I stand by that.
|
Oh dear! You called me a "
****ing coward" ... and you actually
"Stand by it?" Oh no!!!! .... How is it even possible you don't understand how foolish you or anybody looks playing the "Internet Tough Guy?" (
You learned the word "specious" however, GOOD JOB! ⭐) On a neutral field, that's as bad, or 99/100 as bad as the Mensa thing.
Neither do you understand that it's
my opinion to view the AFL as a minor league, which it definitely was it's first 6 or 7 years. Lamar Hunt told the owners not to over-extend: 'Survival comes first.' And I never said they "didn't count." The games were played. They count. The results are correct. It's part of the historic record. But it is MY OPINION they are too flawed to take seriously. I'm sorry to tell you Mr. Tough Guy, but that's an opinion.
As far as the three-peat, that was settled awhile back: One: The 3-peat Chiefs are chasing is predicated on the title "Super Bowl," and the first of GB's three-peat was not a SB. And Two: Even without the name "SB," the point was to match the AFL Champs against the NFL Champs, and the first of GB's three they did not play the AFL Champs. Done.
____________________
I have no problem acknowledging the Texans/Chiefs dominance of the Broncos in the AFL. Plus they won I think three Championships, and played in two of the first four Super Bowls. AND I have no problem acknowledging your current 7-year dominance of the League. Win next Sunday, and they'll set a new standard for dynasties. Never said otherwise. But something tells me
you guys WILL have a problem acknowledging these facts:
BRONCOS - CHIEFS RIVALRY
1960-1973 - TEXANS/CHIEFS dominate
1974-2016 - BRONCOS dominate
2016-2024 - CHIEFS dominate
(
That list ^^^ is opinion, not fact...)
Okay, time for facts:
.

Broncos first ever winning season was 1973... they racked up 7 winning seasons the next 9 years.
The Broncos eight SBs were spread across four distinct timeframes: Mid-late 70s, Mid-late 80s, Mid-late 90s, Early-mid Teens. And the two AFCCG losses were in eras we did NOT go to a SB: Early 90s, Mid 00s.
HEAD-2-HEAD Record
The Head-to-Head record over these 42 seasons won by the Broncos 51-33 - including the 1997 playoff game - and just one game in the strike-shortened 1982 season.
BRONCOS led the better record race: 32-8-2
Denver had the better record in 32 of the 42 seasons, Chiefs in 8, and two ties: 1980 + 2006.
Four of KC's eight years – half their years were in a row: 1992-95. I considered cutting out those 4 and giving them to Kansas City as a dominant era. But four years is too short, and both one year
before and one year
after this four-year streak were Broncos Super Bowl appearances, so I didn’t cut them out. Gives you guys on the Planet something to holler insults at me about.
.