Quote:
Originally Posted by RedinTexas
I kind of disagree. They ended up going with WR as their 1st pick, but that doesn't mean Worthy was the guy they wanted. If their evaluations say that Worthy was going to go high, but he was likely a bust, then it could have been a choice to try to screw the Chiefs. It didn't work out that way, but you hire your staff to give you the analyses that allow you to make such decisions. If the staff ****ed it up, then deal with your staff.
Furthermore, they did get additional draft capital by trading down twice. If their analysis was that they could get a comparable or better WR by trading down, then the draft capital would be worth it. Finally, if everyone else is refusing to trade with the Chiefs, then it presents the opportunity to take advantage of the Chiefs by asking for more draft capital in return than they might have been able to get from anyone else in such a trade.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe
They traded out of the Worthy spot and took Coleman.
You can say it all you want but if they really had their draft board laid out that way, they just aren't very good at college scouting.
|
It just doesn't matter. I don't care that I get an extra sixth rounder. I am not setting myself up to potentially have what happened last Sunday occur any year, let alone the very next season.
Now, had we offered a top 100 pick? Different story. But for what Buffalo got, it was dumb to let KC get their player.