Quote:
Originally Posted by BroncoBuff
Redin, you have a point, but the 1960s just don't seem "prehistoric" to me ... your point: "(Those 60s Packers) are far closer in history to the '29-'31 threepeat than it is to today,"
|
The NFL has changed a great deal over the years. The way the game is played has evolved enormously as the money has grown larger. Saying that the '20s and '30s seem prehistoric to you and that the '60s do not is another way of saying that "anything before I was born is ancient history."
So, you've made the case for disregarding the earlier threepeat of the Packers, but claim that the later threepeat is still relevant despite the fact that you have also claimed that any contests between the Broncos and the Chiefs that occurred before the merger should be disregarded. Now give us your rationale for why that should be.