Thread: Football Broncos news megathread
View Single Post
Old 12-02-2024, 04:10 PM   #79261
RaidersOftheCellar RaidersOftheCellar is offline
MVP
 
RaidersOftheCellar's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2016
Casino cash: $-489600
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroncoBuff View Post
Oh okay, by "almost a decade" you meant Chiefs over Broncos, my mistake. I thought you meant Chiefs vs. the League. Such domination does exist, but it's maybe just 5-6 years.

No no, I definitely DO acknowledge the total numbers, franchise head-ho-head. I just devalue the AFL numbers such that I believe they're not comparable, it wasn't an even playing field.

FIRST OFF: Playing a schedule with 25 other teams stocked with top notch rosters is very different than 7 other teams with good and not-so-good players, plus ....
So...somehow, dividing the pro talent among 25 teams creates more loaded rosters than dividing it among 7? Make it make sense. This is completely backwards. Teams were stocked then and watered down now, especially with the constraint of a salary cap.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BroncoBuff View Post
Here's a good comparison:

For decades the Denver Bears (in their last years "Zephyrs") played baseball in the AAA American Association, as did the Oklahoma City 89ers. In 1991 Denver was awarded a National League franchise the "Colorado Rockies" (not the NHL Hockey team, they moved from Denver to become the New Jersey Devils eight years earlier in 1983), and for the sake of conformity, let's say it was the same owners, Zephyrs and Rockies.

Then, in say, 1992 or 2002, Oklahoma City was awarded a major league baseball franchise. Would anyone seriously acknowledge their H2H from a different league? Acknowledge, yes.Consider an appropriate evaluation of their historical strength? No.

Forget the difference between AFL and NFL, your own Lamar Hunt was adamant that AFL owners pace themselves, not get into bidding wars with NFL teams unless they knew they could afford to - that the short-term rewards of wins and losses paled in comparison with the long-term reward of MERGER.


Far from hiding Otis Taylor in a series of Dallas hotel rooms until you could sign him, the Phipps Brothers offered only rookie minimum contracts to draftees, and consequently signed a none of them, until a framework for the merger was announced and the leagues drafted in one common draft. Broncos drafted pretty damn well then, too .....

1962-66 Broncos Drafts
* Merlin Olsen
* Kermit Alexander
* Bob Hayes
..Jerry Richardson
* Paul Krause
. Wally Hilgenberg
* Bob Brown
* Willie Brown (CFA)
..Ray Mansfield
* Dick Butkus
..Tom Coughlin
- - - - - - - - - -
1967-68
* Floyd Little (1st common draft,1st signed)
* Curley Culp

* = Hall of Fame
Hmmm... Curly Culp? If we were trading you Hall of Fame talent because we couldn't afford to sign them, does that strike you as an even playing field? NO, I didn't think it would!


..
So the SB win vs the NFL's Vikings counts, but we shouldn't count wins vs Denver? Lol. Pretty cringey and desperate stuff here. I've literally never seen this argument from anyone else, and I've seen many a desperate reach from Denver fans.

As a Royals fan, can I scratch all losses to the Yankees and Red Sox because it's not a level playing field? That would actually make a lot more sense than this...

Would you be doing this pretzel twisting if the situation were reversed and Denver started 19-1? I think we all know the answer.
Posts: 17,525
RaidersOftheCellar is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.RaidersOftheCellar is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.RaidersOftheCellar is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.RaidersOftheCellar is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.RaidersOftheCellar is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.RaidersOftheCellar is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.RaidersOftheCellar is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.RaidersOftheCellar is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.RaidersOftheCellar is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.RaidersOftheCellar is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.RaidersOftheCellar is blessed with 50/50 Hindsight.
Thumbs Up 2 Thumbs Down 0     Reply With Quote