Quote:
Originally Posted by Mile High Mania
Denver lost that game in 96 because Michael Dean Perry couldn’t get his fat ass off the field quick enough late in the game.
|
No, the Donks lost because the Jags outplayed the Donks -- especially in the 2nd and 3rd QTR's when they shut out the Donks in both those QTR's.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mile High Mania
Longevity stats.. that’s funny. Nobody brings up longevity until the conversation around Terrell Davis and the HOF comes up.
The revisionist history around here regarding Elway is interesting.
|
Rubbish -- Elway's history hasn't been revised, it's just simply that Donktard mythology regarding Elway has been obliterated by facts and evidence about him that have been posted here.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mile High Mania
Montana and Bradshaw were great, but they also had much better skill players on offense around them for their careers. That is fact.
|
Totally FALSE. Elway
did have good skill players around him when he got to his 3 SB's in the '80's. Elway simply didn't do a consistently good job of throwing the football to them. WR Mark Jackson went to the Giants in '93 and with Phil Simms throwing the ball to him and with Dan Reeves as the Giants coach, Jackson had a career-high 53 catches.
Joe Montana's entire 49ers team in 1981 was not star-studded and not leaps & bounds ahead of any of those '80's Donks teams that made it to the SB. Many would argue they were on par with one another or even that those Donks teams were better minus the QB. The most glaring difference was the 49ers had a QB that was big-money on the big stage (Montana), while the Donks had a QB that played like a girl on the big stage (Elway).
What was that you were saying about "history revision"?