Quote:
Originally Posted by BroncoBuff
"Again?"
*GOOD GRIEF*
If you insist on devoting such a substantial portion of your attention to hate, at least TRY to get it right! I said NOTHING of the kind ... I said that in the unlikely event that calls are being steered your way, I'm sure it's just the refs/league, and the team has nothing to do with it. I guess I also said the funny calls I see are all PI - slightly suspicious cuz they're so potentially result-altering and they're non-reviewable.
If I referred to anything as something I had "never seen before," it must've been Mahomes' 'seizures' on the sidelines. "You were supposed to warn us!" ??? ... YIKES! The wrong kinda Q-Anon conspiracy guy could run with that, sounds like he thinks the refs violated some agreeeee-muhmuhmuh!- whoops! (I don't think that)
And whoops again, I'm prolly talking to a room fulla Q-Anon disciples ... WWG1WGA!
|
Usually such things draw a quick warning from the refs. Hence, why it had
never been called before in Andy Reid's decades-long career. Same with the Dee Ford incident. No one denied that they were technically penalties; just that the timing couldn't have been worse, and these situations usually draw a warning rather than a flag at a critical juncture. Not too different from the logic of KC haters--you can't deny that Mahomes was hit two yds out of bounds in the AFCC--you just didn't like the timing. Very suspiiiiicious!
Apparently there's a YUGE difference between a ref agenda and "suspicious" calls?
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroncoBuff
Never said that. You guys really are damaged, making stuff up so you have something to argue about. Never said they "didn't count." I worked up a statistical analysis from Day 1 in the NFL to Mahomes' first start.
[/I]
|
Sure 'bout that?
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroncoBuff
These Chiefs wieners in here are all whipped up because I don't count their AFL glory ... Well there were only eight teams (later 9 and 10 teams) in the AFL.
|