Quote:
Originally Posted by manchambo
(A)If the referendum didn’t pass, they would’ve had extra cash on hand. If it did pass, and they didn’t set the money aside, they would not have been able to build the stadium.
(B)It is hard to believe that even you could pretend it is inconceivable that a business would set money aside to be able to meet a large expense.
(C)Further, I have not denied that they violated the cap. It is your claim that they violated the cap in such a way as to have extra or better players than they could’ve had otherwise. And you continue to present zero evidence that that is the case.
|
(A) I'll be frank with you......all you're telling anyone with that is you were obviously raised on Milk of Magnesia, because you're totally full of crap. It's not surprising that you would try to spin the false narrative of "if they didn’t set the money aside, they would not have been able to build the stadium" since you Donks homers live in a world of delusion & false spin.
If you really believe that false narrative, then I've got the Brooklyn Bridge for sale to offer to you. Ain't nobody else buying into that.
(B) You must really believe that fans of other teams are as dumb as both Bowlen and Elway look, as evidenced by the fact that you've already had it pointed out to you that such an expense was non-existant until Nov. 3, 1998.
(C) Nice try with bold-faced lie of "presenting no evidence" but you fail. It isn't "my claim" that they violated the cap in such a way as to have extra or better players than they could’ve had otherwise -- it's a provable fact and as I said the evidence has been put forth in this thread repeatedly. Good luck trying to show everybody here that the Donks had any other legit reason for violating the cap outside of "violated the cap in such a way as to have extra or better players than they could’ve had otherwise", as you're going to need it.