Quote:
Originally Posted by staylor26
Because stats mean absolutely nothing without context, especially with a small sample size of a preseason game. He provided some context, and that hurt your feels.
|
He scored on 4/5 drives, with the non-scoring drive due to a receiver fumbling. I'm not talking about his QBR, but the actual results. He threw the ball, receivers caught it, and they got first downs and scored points. That's the entire goal.
He was pretty good. I don't know if you watched the game, but is your conclusion that he actually was bad because some guy I've never heard of tweeted breakdowns of his play in which he claims Nix could have thrown completions in some better fashion?
I can't find any professional analysis that says he wasn't at least "pretty good." For example, if you want to look at some more tweets:
https://sports.yahoo.com/twitter-rea...210030441.html