Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Meck
The thing is, though-you don't want to have a discussion. You want confirmation bias.
You had decided quite on your own, that KC had done a lot of very different things last week.
Most of us have said-nah, it's the same route concepts and stuff, they just played better.
No, that can't be it, you insist.
But it is. Rice and Kelce particularly got it together in the second quarter and played great. But it's the same stuff we always do, because it works as long as you execute it.
We still had MVS running deep routes primarily. Watson mostly, too. Rice and Moore mostly either taking WR screen type plays at the line or drags across the formation while Kelce drifts into the seams. It's the same stuff we always do. They just did it better.
The only play I hadn't seen before was the reverse flea-flicker thing. There ya go! Now THAT was different.
Of course, when the pitch happened, I yelled -OH SHIT WHAT THE ****!
Followed closely by- YAAAAAAS!!!
LOL.
Alright, Andy. That was cute. Let's not make a habit of THAT, lol.
They just got in a groove, man. That's all. They didn't script 40 plays. You couldn't.
They got a good feel for where to go with the ball, and how to attack the coverage rules, and the players executed.
|
Who is “most of us”? because it’s largely been the same guys on the other side of the debate. Just because everyone last week was on the side of our WRs sucking doesn’t mean it’s true because “most of us” saw it that way.
We saw this game very differently.