Quote:
Originally Posted by Buehler445
They all suck dude.
Who’s better?
|
Ian Eagle has always been good at calling Chiefs games, but his current partner Charles Davis thinks he gets paid by the word and is always saying something simplistic in between every play. And Charles Davis tends to assume the official got the call right before watching the replay and on the few occasions when he says the official might be wrong, Davis is usually wrong himself.
Ian Eagle was truly great at describing Tyreek, Mahomes and Kelce plays when they were emerging stars.
I also appreciate that Ian Eagle does not do the Jim Nantz, Tony Romo, Kevin Harlan and Trent Green self-conscious pumping up of the Chiefs opponent as if viewers would tune out the game if they did not exaggerate the other team's chance to compete with the Chiefs.
And after doing the pump up of Chiefs opponent bullshit, they all sound like cheated-on spouses if the Chiefs actually fall behind or lose the game.
Of the CBS crews that get Chiefs games, Ian Eagle is the best play-by-play because he has a good voice and appropriate enthusiasm and he is not as phony as Nantz and Harlan with their fake enthusiasm about the chances of the Chiefs opponent.
Romo was decent until he got the big pay raise. Now he does like Rocky Marciano was described in Sports Illustrated after retirement. he would show up to your event if you paid him with a bag of cash and provided a whore, but not have any real enthusiasm for being there. Except for Romo it is probably greens fees at the best course in town with a group of players that bet but are not that good instead of the whore.