View Single Post
Old 11-25-2023, 05:42 PM   #8038
chiefzilla1501 chiefzilla1501 is offline
In Search of a Life
 

Join Date: Aug 2008
Casino cash: $-1545503
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eleazar View Post
We need an entirely new position group. We have Toney and James who are basically Hardman. Then we have the actual Hardman. Then we have MVS who can only run in a straight line and will drop the ball at the end of it, and Moore who ought to be playing for the Edmonton Eskimos. Our #1 Watson ought to be getting Marcus Kemp snap numbers on a decent team. You can’t replace everyone in one offseason, and my fear is this is now a multi year problem.
I don't see it that way. While a whole new WR would be nice, reality is that we have limited resources and 1-2 new WRs would be a nice big jump. It's not that all our WRs suck. It's that most of them are role and depth WRs elevated to play primary roles. Every single WR we have is being elevated one more level up than theyre capable of. If we had a WR1 this year....

We could have been way more proactive about managing Kelce reps
Mvs and Watson would be fine disappearing for stretches to save for a big play
Rashee could have gradually leaned the game in the slot
Toney could be a full time gadget
Skyy is really the only guy that doesn't make much sense in any aspect

It's ok to fill the back half of our wr depth with role guys especially the cheap ones. The problem iswhen your back end becomes your front lines
Posts: 51,556
chiefzilla1501 is obviously part of the inner Circle.chiefzilla1501 is obviously part of the inner Circle.chiefzilla1501 is obviously part of the inner Circle.chiefzilla1501 is obviously part of the inner Circle.chiefzilla1501 is obviously part of the inner Circle.chiefzilla1501 is obviously part of the inner Circle.chiefzilla1501 is obviously part of the inner Circle.chiefzilla1501 is obviously part of the inner Circle.chiefzilla1501 is obviously part of the inner Circle.chiefzilla1501 is obviously part of the inner Circle.chiefzilla1501 is obviously part of the inner Circle.
    Reply With Quote