Quote:
Originally Posted by -King-
I didn't say of course Mclauren would be better. I said he was a better prospect. Being a better prospect doesn't automatically mean you're going to be better in the league. Mecole could have ended up better and the prospect part still remains.
That's why it's weird how if the big reason to replace Tyreek with Mecole was the speed, and Mclauren has the same speed, why wouldn't the player who does more outside of that be the better prospect?
|
That's exactly what I said you said, dipshit.
Again, you are saying this in hindsight. You don't get to operate solely in hindsight and talk about them as a "prospect". It doesn't work like that.
And I explained the difference between the 2 in the post above yours. McLaurin was not viewed as a guy who played like a. 4.35 guy. He still isn't. He plays like a 4.4 guy.
What he is/was is a more polished WR that had a higher floor coming out.
That still doesn't mean that he fits what the Chiefs specfically were looking for in terms of a deep threat. You'd know that if you knew anything about the "prospects".