Quote:
Originally Posted by WilliamTheIrish
So what?
Chicago drafted a terrible QB. (Been there. Done that)
Jets have top 5 draft picks all over that defensive roster and banked on an aging QB, and it blew up in their faces. (Been there. Done that x 5.)
Denver can be in full tank mode for the rest of my life and I’ll point and laugh.
Staley has offensive and defensive talent all over the field and can’t put it together. **** him/them.
Minnesota just beat the best team in the NFC at home. And played the Chiefs tough in there also.
The Chiefs have taken on all comers and they ****ing win. It only seems to matter to a few hard heads who think the season has to go according to what their NFL minds think it should go. Have you done this with every other division leader? Is their division so tough top to bottom, that it’s sent you and the usual suspects into the labyrinth of “We won, but”!? Eat an oil drum of peens.
Holy ****, I’ve never seen any group so full of shit. (Well, maybe Denver fans in the 98/99 years).
|
When people keep insisting that this is the same offensive production as last year or that our pass offense hasn’t had quite a few challenges, yeah that context matters. On pass offense we’ve been below what we are capable of and we’ve done it against largely bad pass defenses. It is taking the data that is being presented as absolute with a heavy grain of salt.
And that’s ok. We are all on the same page that the rotation we are evolving to is much much better. We all agree skyy and Toney have been very disappointing. We know hardman was brought in to largely patch up some holes in our pass offense. Most people agree that the solutions are way better which suggests we weren’t playing close to our potential. So why is that controversial?