Quote:
Originally Posted by staylor26
Even with "13 seconds" it still took getting the ball last. Not to mention if the Bills weren't reeruns, it's doesn't happen.
Also, what happened after 13 seconds? Did the Chiefs go on to win a SB?
It's hilarious that people will look at last year and say it can't be duplicated, and the Chiefs were very fortunate, but you fail to apply the same logic to having an all-time great offense and a bad defense.
Even with our all-time great offense we were VERY close to having zero SBs.
Meanwhile, we're in year 2 of the post Tyreek era with 1, and we're sitting at 4-1 right now while our young WRs are going through growing pains.
Yet there are so many that still insist we're doing it totally wrong.
It's amusing.
|
"History be damned, I know what I know!!!"
Teams don't just build a powerhouse offense and keep it together for a decade. It doesn't get done. And those teams that tried it DIDN'T win with it.
The 'Offensive Triplets' approach has yielded short term success but the teams that have been dominant over long periods have tended to work towards balance and broad production/contributions.
It's the ONLY way to address and treat the 'Disease of More'. As teams get more and more successful, the mouths that were a part of it will demand to be fed more and more. So...you have to cycle 'em. And you have to alter how you win.
The Chiefs have done what every successful long-term powerhouse has done before them.
But yeah - we should just pretend like we were gonna score 32 points/gm every season of PMs career instead...