Quote:
Originally Posted by BWillie
Yes thats exactly what we mean. No Kelce no hosting AFC Championship. Doesn't mean we will be bad or even really reallygood. You need to raise your expectations. The difference between winning a SB and not is razor thin. Not doing so means you give Mahomes shit weapons for a decade like they did to Rodgers in GB.
|
This is the same idiot shit we got from the Tyreek trade, too.
People go, "Without Tyreek, we don't have anybody to beat the 49ers in the 4th quarter of the SB." Yeah. That can happen if a really good player all of a sudden just disappears from your team.
These guys don't just disappear. They make choices in the offseason. The team makes choices in the offseason. The team makes plans for life without said player. Multiple years in advance in many cases.
If Kelce retires at the end of this season, do you think the Chiefs are just going to keep trucking along on the same path they are and say, "Noah Gray and/or Skyy Moore will just have to replace Kelce's production"
BigRedChief is an attention whore, but he's usually smarter than this kind of idiocy, especially in the Mahomes era. We're going to have to adjust to a new way of approaching the offense if Kelce retires, yes. Mahomes is going to have to adjust. And boy, we just don't know if he can! And we just don't know if Veach is capable of putting together teams and talent that can win Super Bowls when we lose star players!