Quote:
Originally Posted by Megatron96
So you’re saying we have 5 WR2s? Because I don’t see it. I see possibly 1, and maybe two 3s; then whatever. And there’s still a coin flip’s chance we don’t have any 2s. Right this second, we have three 3s, with one that might be really a 4, and one with injury issues.
If we have 5 WR2s, I’d love to see that. As in, replace any 2 on another playoff team, excluding NYG, and explain how our replacement would be better than the guy he’s replacing.
|
I'm not.
But that's not what you said.
"Quality is always preferable over quantity in every situation..."
No, you want quality without a consideration of quantity. Your position is you want Kelce over Gray - sure, who doesn't? But if I offer you 1 Hill or 3 Devante Smiths, I think you'd be far better served to take the 3 Devante Smith's.
Which is again why I said you're being dogmatic; speaking in absolutes when they're just obviously not warranted or accurate.
At quarterback? Yeah, you want 1 great one vs. 2 good ones. At OT? Give me two good ones over 1 great one and slag. Would I take Orlando Pace and Trazelle Jenkins over our present bookent OTs? No, no I would not. Hell, in MOST situation in sports, quantity can, and often does, supersede quality.
You overplayed your hand. Badly.