Quote:
Originally Posted by ThyKingdomCome15
I'm impressed with McDuffie's coverage skills but he's an absolute menace in the run game and short passes behind the LOS. He's a complete player.
With that said how is Sneed and Watson in the 50's? Makes no sense. PFF is so hit and miss but I like them.
George is more than a 65 as well. He's at least a 75.
How is Gay in the 50's? Our D is playing better than anybody's and PFF says there's JAG's all over it.
How is Rice an 81 with all the drops?
It's early, PFF will get their **** together when we smoke the Jets.
|
I actually thought Sneed did look a little rusty the first 2 games. Watson got beaten on 2 long-ish throws late, I believe, the last game. But I totally agree. There are some scores where every individual score could be 70+ for a DL guy - like coverage, run D, pass-rush, tackling, all above 70 and then the overall score is 55 or something. Sometimes it's probably a result of fumbles and things you need to look into more, but frequently I'm scratching my head.
Also some guys they just reeaaally seem to dislike. Gay is one, which I sort of get, he's inconsistent. But if I remember they always gave McKinnon crappy blocking grades - I have no idea what they are seeing.
Re Karlaftis they always mark down his run D, which again I think is sometimes actually pretty fair. I think he could improve there. But this last game they marked him down and he looked solid to me. They DID give him a 75-ish for pass-rush which looked fair, he was great. But man, i dunno, just all over the shop.