Quote:
Originally Posted by TwistedChief
How do you feel now versus how you felt last year after the Colts game?
And who thinks that replacing JJSS with a legit WR1 would be a bad thing for the offense!? But typically obtaining a WR1 would mean resources being limited elsewhere.
|
we’ve heard it all. I’m fine with the tyreek trade but several have lobbed him under the bus as if he was some target hog, as opposed to asking why we surrounded him with JAG WRs. We ran a very efficient offense with tyreek then bailed because drob/hardman kept killing drives with costly drops. Or that while it’s nice to have we don’t need WR1s because mahomes and kelce can carry it, and because we were #1 last year so there are diminishing returns. It was one of the last positions on their priority list. Many were content with skyy stepping in for juju being all we needed to do (thankfully, the chiefs disagreed and drafted rashee).
I don’t buy that at all. I think we have way more upside and I’ve been beating the drum that we’ve got to ask kelce to do less sooner vs later and that’s gonna hurt way more than we think.
I felt fine last year because I believed it was a rebuild. I am fine this year but only because we drafted rashee. I pushed for a bandaid Wr this offseason so it wouldn’t be nearly this chaotic. But whatever. I’m fine being patient with the group we have. I just really disagree with how much we’ve devalued the position.