Quote:
Originally Posted by Megatron96
I don't care how the Jags do. But when I look at KC, I want to see how they're really doing, not how a few skewed statlines make them look. It's called being as objective as possible.
Look, in today's game it says that Skyy caught three balls for 70.0 yards. Which is an average of 23.3 yards/catch. Which would be great, if he actually caught three balls that were all roughly 20 yards a piece.
But they weren't. Skyy caught a ball for 7 yards. Then in the 2nd half he caught another ball for 9 yards. Basically, we're talking about 8 yards/catch.
Then he catches that last ball, and after the RAC, he ends up with 70 yards on the day, for an averqge of 23.3yds/cach.
But we know that he didn't catch three balls for an average of 23 yards/catch. he caught a ball for 7 yards, and then a ball for 9 yards, or nowhere near 23 yards, right?
Right?
I mean, if you're Andy, when game-planning for next week, do you really think he's dumb enough to think to himself, "Skyy's been catching balls at a rate of TWO DOZEN YARDS PER RECEPTION. I need to replace MVS is Skyy!!!"
Yeah, not a chance in hell.
|
Yeah that's all completely absurd.
You literally had a paragraph detailing how the Jags ALMOST had a couple touchdowns; yet you will happily remove plays that actually happened to try to downplay the Chiefs actual output as if that is somehow more realistic. You did this shit all last season and off-season too- they weren't REALLY the number one offense, because in this stretch of games, they struggled-
Guess what, man? It's the NFL. Nobody is flawless, nobody scores 30 plus points EVERY week, nobody goes undefeated, and the plays that happened count.
Skyy's big play counts, and if you were to be honest, you'd have to admit that this week was a LOT better than last week. 300+ passing and Kelce had 26 yards?
17 points, but you fail to mention we kneeled on their goal line to run the clock.
Penalties were the big issue, today.