Quote:
Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501
My issue is that in pursuit of a defense (and I get the urgency) it often feels like we react to an offensive position group falling apart vs proactively fixing. Kelce is a great current example. will we wait for kelce to leave before we bring in a TE1? As opposed to saying a TE1 can make a great TE2 until kelce eases his transition off.
I don’t buy into the idea that having tyreek and kelce made the wr position any less important. Considering depth players still play roles. But we did treat wr depth like an afterthought for a good while.
|
I liked Kincaid and La Porta this draft. Seems like we weren't really looking at them.