Quote:
Originally Posted by O.city
And yet Jones made that much of an impact still.
You're paying those guys like Jones on the plays you need them to make in big spots. It may not be the most financially stable, but you need force multipliers.
|
I get it, and I tried to make the point that by having 140% of his snap counts covered, you might lose 100% of his game breaking plays.
Again, there's no right answer here. There is the safest route, the most daring route, and a universe of possibilities in between.
Personally, I wouldn't invest in the position. It's not about the player, really. DTs just don't play enough to warrant that kind of cap investment for how I would construct a team, but at this point I am much more in favor of paying him.