Quote:
Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla
It's not misleading at all, though. It's factual. We know he still had Kelce, as Rodgers still had other players as well.
This was likely referencing the narrative of how losing these players would impact A Aron and Pat, respectively (in case you don't recall the narrative surrounding the loss of Tyreek last offseason...)
|
My point is that while it's true that Rodgers struggled without Adams and Pat didn't struggle nearly as much without Tyreek, the truth is that Tyreek was never Pat's actual 1. Travis was.
Meanwhile, Rodgers true 1 was in fact D. Adams. Adams=Travis. Not Adams=Tyreek.
to make it more apples to apples, Pat would have to play a season without Travis, not Tyreek.