Quote:
Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501
They can plenty afford a quick 2-3 year option. And that's why you look at some of these 3rd contract veterans. Because they're cheaper and more willing to take less security in order to front load the contract which allows us to ditch them when our young guys are good enough to be featured options. It's not like other teams where you're looking for a centerpiece to the offense. A bandaid is something very different.
|
MVS is a bandaid. 20 million plus per year for a WR who's over 30 isn't a bandaid.
They can't afford to put that into a vet that you have to roll that money into multiple years to make it work, then potentially cut them lost and eat cash.