Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe
Again, two different thought streams, two different conversations going on at once.
They're BOTH true. I would prefer they not draft a tackle in the first. But as I already demonstrated, I'm not dead set against it if there are no other options. It would just be my last resort, not my first, as some are advocating here. That's what I want. I would rather see them draft tackle depth (with some upside) in the middle rounds.
As for what I think will actually happen - I've been clear about that too. I think the Chiefs view it much the same way I do. That's where my wants and their plan come together and probably why this seems confusing. I think the Chiefs will ultimately do what I want - they're going to stick Taylor at LT, draft an OT in the middle rounds, and look to start Niang at RT to start the season.
Is the distinction clear now?
|
I don't mean to get into an argument about semantics but:
"I very clearly said I don't want them to take a OT at 31"
And
"I'm not against them taking a tackle at 31"
Are absolutely contradictory statements dude. Now you've changed it to "I would prefer they not..."
I'm seriously not trying to be a dick here, but you're making it seem like it's just that I'm not getting it.