Quote:
Originally Posted by Megatron96
I've refrained from mentioning this, because I don't want to get into the Travis' future health/production purely speculative conversation, but yeah, it is pretty dissonant. Travis will be fine at 34 because he's a Chief, DHop@30 won't because he isn't. Okay.
|
Yeah, a few things to set straight here guys...
1) If Kelce can produce elite numbers in KC at 34, so can Hopkins at 30.
2) No one cares about Sky Moore's development being hindered by Hopkins, who is a current top 10 elite WR.
3) Hopkins has missed some games, but he's more likely to complete a full season than Toney as our #1.
4) Hopkins has indicated he'd be flexible with his contract, and it's now being reported for a second time.
5) Yes, a late 2nd or 3rd would be expensive BUT there are no WRs in those rounds that would contribute to a SB the way Hopkins can over the next 2 seasons.
Continue...