Quote:
Originally Posted by The Franchise
Cool. Then post it once or twice. Dude is just repeatedly shitting all over the thread with the same thing....over and over and over.
It's cool...you didn't like TLOU2. You aren't alone in that but it literally has zero bearing on your life.
But what did I expect? WallCrawler literally shits all over every thread he's about like he's some ****ing expert on EVERYTHING.
|
Feel free to scroll past the criticisms, Neil....er...The Franchise.
This is a discussion on how season 2 will be received by watchers of the series, and how if it follows the game (which it will, Druckmann can't take an L on his prize piece of shit revenge project he wanted to do since college, but was shot down at every turn by anyone with a modicum of common sense, and only when those people with moving brain cells left the company and Neil rose to VP and instituted groupthink over common ****ing sense did he get to have his way) then the fan backlash will be tremendous.
Perhaps instead of reading the criticisms I have about the terrible decisionmaking, writing, direction, and incoherent order of the storytelling that make you sad, maybe go enjoy a Neil Druckmann interview.
Perhaps the one in which he describes weeping at his own work. That always brightens my ****ing day.
In any case, the structure of season 2 almost has to change. You can't repeat the same mistakes of showing half the story from one side, and right at a key moment, stop the storytelling on that side to say
BUT WAIT! Let's now take a few episodes to see how we got here!
There will be no stakes, no tension, because viewers will already know where a lot of these key players end up.
Like I saw character A talking to character B on day 3, so when character A is in what is supposed to be a tense life or death moment, it falls flat, because I already know that character A makes it to talk to character B later.
Its going to have to fundamentally change. It can't become the story slog that the character switch in the game was.