Quote:
Originally Posted by RedinTexas
You are engaging in a fallacy of logic known as "hypothesis contrary to fact." You are hypothesizing what would have happened if what actually happened had not actually taken place. You are wrong in your supposition because you are imagining a set of circumstances that directly contradict reality. You are, therefore, demonstrably wrong because you're not dealing within the bounds of reality.
|
I’ve only said they may have allowed it to stand, because it has happened before. You stated with certainty: “It would have never happened if the Chiefs had scored a TD just as it never happened when the Chiefs failed to gain the 1st down.” I’m not the one engaging in a fallacy.