Quote:
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe
How good would the Chiefs be if they lost:
- Their #2 WR to an ACL before the season started
- Their #1 RB to an ACL by week 4
- Their starting LT, Center and #2 Corner for the season by week 5
- Their number 1 TE for the first 5 and last 2 games
- Both of their starting edge defenders for the last 8 games
- Their best safety for 5 games
- Their best interior rusher for 4 games
All while their QB was playing through a torn lat in his throwing shoulder and a partially torn hamstring for a chunk of the season? |
Tim Patrick is another Byron Pringle. We'd be fine.
We lose RBs to injury (and kicking women) all the ****ing time, and the offense never skips a beat, dipshit.
The Chiefs were missing their starting LG, C, and RT in 2015 and won a playoff game and rattled off like 9 straight wins to end the year
All of your TEs are crap. You lose the "top" guy and one of them is just as good as the next
It's your own ****ing fault for signing Randy Gregory in the first place, dipshit. The Chiefs haven't had that problem because we don't invest in brokedicks.
And the rest of those injuries are temporary. 4 games? You can't go 4-5 games without a certain non-QB starter playing? Well, in your case, if your starting QB missed 4-5 games, you'd have a better chance of winning.
Great teams find ways to get it done in spite of the injuries they face. They're not the same team, no, but they don't melt into a puddle of vaginas like you did