Quote:
Originally Posted by staylor26
It's the ****ing Chargers.
Both of those WRs are hurt. His OL is hurt. His defense has multiple injuries. His HC is not an NFL HC.
Not to mention a Herbert himself has been playing hurt for the majority of the season.
You aren't giving the Ravens enough credit as a team and organization.
Also, regardless of the disappointment, the Chargers are still a "playoff contender". They're currently still a playoff team.
|
Were they hurt last year, too?
Didn't take you for a Herbert truther lol
LOL @ the idea of Herbert somehow leading the Lions to the playoffs when he can't even do it with twice the talent in LA.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Detoxing
Roster turnover would be part of the equation, whether you stated it or not.
The point of the Mahomes/Allen comparisons is that there really are a few QB's in the league that can do what you described. Lamar ain't one of them.
If you have to change the team and the scheme, then it really isn't "any" team, as in, the current state in which it's constructed.
Megatron laid it out well.
Without changing what the Lions do, can Lamar come in and lead a dynamic passing attack there? No. The answer is no. That specific Lions team, as it is presently constructed no.
|
Roster turnover wouldn't be necessary and I don't think Lamar would lead a dynamic passing attack anywhere, which is why he'd need a scheme change.
Again, I never stated or even implied that Jackson was on the same level, WHICH IS WHY I WAS SURE TO NOTE THAT HE'D REQUIRE A SCHEME CHANGE AND DID NOT DO THE SAME FOR MAHOMES OR ALLEN.
But you put him on a team, add some read-option here, RPO there, and Jackson would take any team to the playoffs with their current personnel and coaching staff. Not because he'd create some unstoppable air raid offense, but because he adds such a dynamic ground element that is difficult for most teams to defend.