Quote:
Originally Posted by RaidersOftheCellar
I've already said multiple times that I don't think any of them were great when they played in Denver. But Keenum did go 11-3 the year before and went to the conference championship, right? Meaning it is possible to win games with him? And the year after he left, they won 5 fewer games and missed the playoffs, so it's not like he had a loaded roster. The teams QBed by Keenum and Bridgewater posted the best records of any Vikings teams in the last dozen years. And Keenum's team was the only one to reach the conference title game.
Whether you admit it or not, my take makes a lot more sense than what you're arguing. You're basically saying that everybody knew these guys were shit and Elway signed them anyway. And paid Keenum a few million less than Rodgers was making at the time. You're also saying that it was known that Wilson wasn't a great option, yet the trade and contract are those you'd offer a freaking MVP caliber QB. I mean.....come on.
The consensus here wasn't that Wilson was "done," it was that his athleticism was declining and he wasn't elite. Not that he'd lead them to the lowest-ranked offense in the NFL.
Is it not fair to say that Denver got less than expected from EVERY single one of these guys, including Lock?
|
Fair? On a Chiefs board? **** Denver and this fair bullshit. It wasn't fair we had to endure playoff loss after loss for 50 ****ing years and the long list of total bums we have had either. **** fair.