Quote:
Originally Posted by staylor26
This is a move for the next 2-3 years. The Chiefs have 2 of their top 3 WRs with expiring contracts after this year.
It has nothing to do with Moore.
As for why that's further proof, people are acting like the Chiefs traded for a WR because they're unhappy with Moore. They've probably been eyeing Toney going back to the draft. They've definitely had their eyes on him since trad stumped started in the sorting (April which is before the draft).
This is t thst complicated.
|
That's awfully strong.
If Moore had gone out there and forced himself into starters reps, perhaps the 3rd rounder they used on Toney would've gone to Quinn.
I think it has SOMETHING to do with Moore. With the obvious added benefit of what he can provide long-term.
And citing their spring interest in him doesn't say much there either. They didn't know what they had in Moore or even Watson. Or MVS or JJSS for that matter. Why wouldn't they be interested in adding to the WR room? But ultimately Moore, with the solid performance of JJSS and MVS, could've made his addition a less valuable use of the asset.