|
Here is the part that I find suspicious:
"Another former student, identified in the lawsuit as John Doe 7044, said he had heard rumors his freshman year that Gordon was allegedly abusing students, according to the lawsuit. During his senior year, he allegedly confronted Gordon in a text about the rumors; in return, Gordon allegedly told him to send her pictures of his penis and sent him nude photographs of herself. She allegedly sexually assaulted him the next day in the locker room and the abuse continued throughout his senior year until he cut off contract with her."
Seems like Dude hears this woman is banging students. He sends her a text (how'd he get her number?) saying "you banging students?"
She replies "yeah send me a dick pic, here's what I got (nudes attached)"
The next day they have sex.
Abuse? How did they get into the same room the next day? Naked? having sex? Supposedly he went to admonish her and try to convert her to Jesus and not having sex?
WTF this stinks.
(also here's an other alternate opinion just for balance)
But if you look at the basic rule of power and influence the legal argument is the boys had no ability to think clearly as they were subconsciously influenced by her position of authority. If it was a male teacher and girls we'd all be probably saying the dude needs his dick cut off.
|