Quote:
Originally Posted by GROB
I'd hate to point out who you guys played in those games. That Denver game was a glorified preseason game. Mahomes is great dont get me wrong but Tyreek made the offense really dangerous requiring so much coverage. I think KC made the right move not signing him too since that isn't a long term solution and cap killer. Like I said it will be interesting to see how they do without him.
|
Really? I wouldn't. We played the Baltimore Ravens (that was the year that they went 14-2, dominated the AFC all year and Lamar was MVP) and Pat and the boys smoked them . . . . . without Tyreek Hill playing.
And as was already pointed out in this thread, towards the end of last season against Pittsburgh when we had a BUNCH of players out (including Kelce) due to COVID and Hill only played the first couple possessions, Pat had one of his best offensive games of the year spreading the ball around. In fact, I would argue that Pat is a BETTER QB when he DOES spread the ball around to different guys and doesn't try to force it down the field to Hill (as he was accustomed to doing sometimes).
You all are going to be awful disappointed when the new Chiefs offense ends up being better and more efficient than the old one . . . . . . . .