Quote:
Originally Posted by TwistedChief
I fully understood the logic behind the Hill deal when all was said and done.
And I fully understand why Veach is inquiring about top WRs. Leave no stone unturned.
But I do not fully understand the logic in giving up a lot of picks and paying a lot of money for a WR not named Tyreek Hill.
Adams and Hill both had leverage and were willing to sit out. On some level, that reduced their value. Why would Washington trade McLaurin for instance after they went out and got Wentz? The team has all the leverage on their end and it wouldn't be some bargain price even if they were open to dealing.
I know we all like to dream though...
|
They're not going to trade Hill for picks and then turn around and trade all of those picks for another high-priced WR. Don't even worry about it.
If they trade for a WR, it's going to be a mid-level guy and mid-level draft picks in exchange.