Quote:
Originally Posted by TwistedChief
I fully understood the logic behind the Hill deal when all was said and done.
And I fully understand why Veach is inquiring about top WRs. Leave no stone unturned.
But I do not fully understand the logic in giving up a lot of picks and paying a lot of money for a WR not named Tyreek Hill.
Adams and Hill both had leverage and were willing to sit out. On some level, that reduced their value. Why would Washington trade McLaurin for instance after they went out and got Wentz? The team has all the leverage on their end and it wouldn't be some bargain price even if they were open to dealing.
I know we all like to dream though...
|
If Veach makes a trade, he likely won't be doing both of those things. It would be one or the other. Hell, maybe neither. (hi, laviska)