Quote:
Originally Posted by The Franchise
Adams is 29, genius.
|
So, Hill will be 29 next year, so his age for trade value shouldn’t be a factor when Adams got the same trade value, better imo, at 29 years old. That’s the point; age wasn’t an issue with trading hill. Why trade hill with one year left on his contract when we could have gotten the same value in trade next year? And don’t say for the cap. Chiefs could have found a way.