Quote:
Originally Posted by TwistedChief
This is such a stupid argument. Both of those people had success in their prior roles. That's typically a prerequisite to be poached by other organizations, and that's true in any field. Regardless of the relationships they have.
What world do you live in that you can't see that's pretty standard? I see this every single day in my industry.
It's called a meritocracy. And it's exactly why EB didn't get a head coaching job.
|
Ah, yes. You're basically describing a tendency in most organizational hierarchies, for every employee to rise in the hierarchy through promotion until they reach a level of respective incompetence.
You're describing the ****ing peter principle, TC.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwistedChief
The peter principle? Which is something that applies to basic, tired, bureaucratic corporations who just keep promoting average and borderline competent people because that's the general upward drift of a career?
You seriously think the Chiefs coaching ranks are like that? It's just any old job? Performance doesn't matter?
This doesn't remotely align with the peter principle.
|
Reread this whole sequence, and do better.