Quote:
Originally Posted by -King-
You realize not having a plan doesn't mean you cant disqualify terrible plans right? I don't know or have studied all the tackles in free agency but I do know a 39 year old injury prone tackle who was terrible and who has his owns fans wishing he'd retire isn't a good solution.
|
Stats and Eagles fans on the internet. The be all end all for player evaluation and personnel decision making!
Coming up with a better plan doesn’t require you to “study” all the tackles in free agency.
The list of free agent LT’s is incredibly short to start. It would take 2 minutes to look at the list and come away with the conclusion that unfortunately Peters might be the best we can do, or at the very least, there aren’t any options that are clearly better.
“Not having a plan doesn’t mean you can’t disqualify terrible plans”, but it goes to show that you have no ****ing clue about OL play around the NFL, what’s available, and how Peters compares to other cheap/realistic options. Like I said, you saw that Peters gave up 8 sacks, with no context/nuance, and you’ve already decided that “anybody” would be better.
Peters still managed to come away with a 67.6 grade according to PFF. I know it’s PFF, but you can’t be SO bad that literally “anybody” would be better if you have a good grade according to them. It doesn’t work like that. Peters is clearly not the player he was, but he’s STILL a better short term option at LT than the Remmers or Erving’s of the world.